Conducted across various member organisations of ANE, this survey on AI usage and concerns among Nordic engineers and STEM professionals shed light on the current state of AI adoption, its impact, and the challenges faced by professionals in the field.
Widespread AI Adoption
A significant 59% of Nordic STEM professionals report using AI at work, indicating a strong trend towards the adoption of AI technologies. The primary applications include exploring new concepts (27%), content creation (26%), and assisting in creative processes (25%). This widespread utilisation underscores the need for continuous training and adaptation to fully harness the benefits of AI.
AI has positively impacted the productivity of more than one-third (35%) of Nordic STEM professionals. However, 20% feel that AI has not made them more productive, and 45% are unsure about its impact. This uncertainty may stem from a lack of exposure to AI, as 41% of respondents do not use AI at work.
Lack of AI Guidelines and Training
Only 23% of professionals believe their company offers extensive AI policies or guidance. This lack of clear guidelines can lead to inconsistent practices and potential misuse of AI technologies. Enhancing AI policies within organisations is crucial for maximising benefits while minimising risks.
A concerning 8% of respondents feel adequately trained in AI-related skills. Without sufficient training, professionals may struggle to leverage emerging technologies effectively, hindering innovation and competitiveness.
Concerns About Bias and Privacy
Lack of guidelines, understanding, and training can lead to mistrust. Although a majority are unconcerned, 36% of STEM professionals are apprehensive about bias and discrimination in AI implementation. Additionally, 39% of respondents express privacy concerns.
Download the Full Report
For a detailed analysis, download the full survey report here.
Methodology
The respondents are members of various ANE member organisations, which include engineers and other STEM professionals. However, it’s important to note that membership criteria and sample sizes vary across these organisations, depending on whether the survey was conducted as a stand-alone survey or as part of a larger one. In interpreting the findings, we have focused on overall Nordic trends rather than variations between countries and organisations.